is darwin theory right or wrong related to islam
Answers
Answered by
0
Islamic views on evolution are diverse, ranging from theistic evolution to Old Earth creationism. Some Muslims around the world believe "humans and other living things have evolved over time," yet some others believe they have "always existed in present form.
Answered by
2
hey mate here is your answer ⤵⤵
“Darwin was wrong” are the opening words of A.N. Wilson’s new biography,Charles Darwin: Victorian Mythmaker. I enjoyed the book, and I learned a lot from it. Wilson’s knowledge of the Victorian era is encyclopedic, and he was able to fill the book with fascinating details about Darwin and his contemporaries. But the book’s most interesting feature is its firm rejection of Darwin’s theory of evolution.
As his opening words suggest, Wilson intended his book as a gauntlet thrown at the feet of the Darwin lobby, and the lobby picked the gauntlet up. What followed was a series of reviews that panned the book — some with titles that asked rhetorically whether Wilson’s is “the worst book about Darwin ever written” or “how wrong can a biography be?”
British Darwinist Steve Jones called Wilson’s book “the founding volume of the Fake News School of Science Writing,” and American Darwinist Jerry Coyne called it “by far the worst” non-creationist book about Darwin he had ever read.
Unfortunately, Wilson was mistaken about some historical details. For example, to portray Darwin as a man who stole ideas from others, Wilson claimed that Darwin cut fifty pages from one of his notebooks to hide his intellectual indebtedness to Edward Blyth, and that the pages are still missing. But the pages were found and published decades ago, and they make almost no mention of Blyth. On this point Wilson was wrong.
As historian Michael Flannery has pointed out, Wilson was mistaken about many other details, too. But mistakes in historical details are not what really bothered the hostile reviewers quoted above. They were bothered by Wilson’s skepticism of Darwin’s theory.
First, Wilson pointed out that the general idea of biological evolution preceded Charles Darwin. His grandfather Erasmus had written about it; so had Jean-Baptiste Lamarck; so had Robert Chambers — the anonymous author of the 1844 book Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation.
Wilson gave Darwin ample credit for his scientific accomplishments, but not for discovering evolution. “Was Charles Darwin one of the greatest naturalists who ever lived? Undoubtedly,” Wilson wrote on page 358.
hope this will help you✌
“Darwin was wrong” are the opening words of A.N. Wilson’s new biography,Charles Darwin: Victorian Mythmaker. I enjoyed the book, and I learned a lot from it. Wilson’s knowledge of the Victorian era is encyclopedic, and he was able to fill the book with fascinating details about Darwin and his contemporaries. But the book’s most interesting feature is its firm rejection of Darwin’s theory of evolution.
As his opening words suggest, Wilson intended his book as a gauntlet thrown at the feet of the Darwin lobby, and the lobby picked the gauntlet up. What followed was a series of reviews that panned the book — some with titles that asked rhetorically whether Wilson’s is “the worst book about Darwin ever written” or “how wrong can a biography be?”
British Darwinist Steve Jones called Wilson’s book “the founding volume of the Fake News School of Science Writing,” and American Darwinist Jerry Coyne called it “by far the worst” non-creationist book about Darwin he had ever read.
Unfortunately, Wilson was mistaken about some historical details. For example, to portray Darwin as a man who stole ideas from others, Wilson claimed that Darwin cut fifty pages from one of his notebooks to hide his intellectual indebtedness to Edward Blyth, and that the pages are still missing. But the pages were found and published decades ago, and they make almost no mention of Blyth. On this point Wilson was wrong.
As historian Michael Flannery has pointed out, Wilson was mistaken about many other details, too. But mistakes in historical details are not what really bothered the hostile reviewers quoted above. They were bothered by Wilson’s skepticism of Darwin’s theory.
First, Wilson pointed out that the general idea of biological evolution preceded Charles Darwin. His grandfather Erasmus had written about it; so had Jean-Baptiste Lamarck; so had Robert Chambers — the anonymous author of the 1844 book Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation.
Wilson gave Darwin ample credit for his scientific accomplishments, but not for discovering evolution. “Was Charles Darwin one of the greatest naturalists who ever lived? Undoubtedly,” Wilson wrote on page 358.
hope this will help you✌
Similar questions
Chemistry,
7 months ago
Geography,
7 months ago
Psychology,
7 months ago
Social Sciences,
1 year ago
Math,
1 year ago