is fighting the only way of resolving conflicts.... what else can be done to reach a mutually acceptable settlement...
Answers
Answered by
66
no fighting is not only way of resolving conflicts and best example of that is mahatma gandhi who used non violence as his weapon and result is u can see
muskan115:
if u like it mark it as brainliest please
I liked both of urs
hmm good how many points you get
wat
I can't select the blacklist answer
sorry
brainliest
wat u mean
if u liked it plz mark it as brainliest please
if u liked it then mark it as brainliest pls Mark it
Answered by
51
As I see it, fighting is the worse way to resolve a conflict. If we look back at History fighting in wars or against other people suggest that it ends in a horrible way for one party or potentially both. Furthermore in religion fighting is seen as a cowardly thing to do and some religions suggest that fighting shows a person temper and how they can't control themselves. However, fighting for entertainment is allowed by religion.
Other methods can be much more accepted and mutually acceptable. Negotiations and trade or just simple allowance of land or rights are more effective than fighting.
However, people see fighting as a last resort. Like a nail in a coffin or a direct message to a person.
Other methods can be much more accepted and mutually acceptable. Negotiations and trade or just simple allowance of land or rights are more effective than fighting.
However, people see fighting as a last resort. Like a nail in a coffin or a direct message to a person.
Similar questions