is our Indian judiciary pro rich against the motion
Answers
The lower legal executive in India is very degenerate however that isn't the situation with higher legal executive (High Courts and Supreme Court). It is especially conceivable to impact the decisions of the lower courts; cash control works here. There are few instances of debasement in higher legal executive as well. Preeminent Court concocted the framework to PIL just to make legal executive progressively open to needy individuals and we have seen numerous milestone decisions by courts under the PIL framework.
Like alternate mainstays of majority rules system, the official and the administrative, the legal executive as well (in a few occurrences) has been found to take part in debasement. There has not been built up any arrangement of responsibility. On account of legal procedures, even the media can't give an appropriate and clear image of the defilement situation. The media is by all accounts progressively centered around uncovering defilement in different fields, particularly the official. A clergyman taking an influence or circulating cash amid races may turn into a feature, yet a court agent taking a pay off and adjusting the date of the preliminary stays unnoticed.
According to the sacred arrangement, there is no arrangement yet to enroll a FIR against a judge who has taken fix without taking the consent of the Chief Justice of India. Clearly, visiting the CJI, looking for his authorization, and afterward enlisting a FIR isn't what a poor man will like to do. This will turn out to be increasingly costly and tedious for him, other than the court and legal counselor's costs.