Sociology, asked by ssadafjaffri668, 7 months ago

It is Mario Alvarez’s lucky day. He is 14 years old and has Rs.7500 in his pocket. Mario’s older brother, Ricardo, plays in a band. Last night Ricardo’s boss paid the band extra for playing longer than usual. Ricardo split his part of the extra pay with Mario because Mario had helped him carry the band’s instruments several times.
Now, Mario faces a nice decision, what to do with the Rs 7500? For about a year now, Mario has wanted a digital camera. If he had one, he and his friends could take pictures together and have lots of fun. There is a problem, however. The digital camera Mario wants costs 9000. The 7500 Mario has would be a good start toward buying the camera. However, Mario would have to wait until he got the rest of the money to buy the camera.
Mario also wants some new clothes. They cost 7000. Mario knows he would look great in the new clothes.
Mario loves to go to basketball games with his uncle who sometimes comes to town to visit. The 7500 would pay for a season ticket to see his favorite team play. Then he wouldn’t have to wait for his uncle to come to town. These are three alternatives Mario has for using his Rs. 7500. Suppose you are asked by Mario to help him think about these alternatives.
Please tell I will mark you as brainliest!!!

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
0

Answer:

Explanation:

Directions (1-10): Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words are given in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the questions.

In spite of his 1841 execution, DiogoAlves "lives" on to this day. For years, DiogoAlves terrorized the people of Lisbon, Portugal, killing or stealing at will. Although he was executed in 1841, he still “lives” on in a bizarre way. Indeed, today, 176 years after his death, his perfectly preserved head can be seen in a glass jar at the University of Lisbon’s Faculty of Medicine. DiogoAlves is considered by many to be Portugal’s first serial killer. He was born in Galicia in 1810 and traveled to Lisbon as a young child to work as a servant in the affluent homes of the capital city. It wasn’t long before young Alves realized that a life of crime was better for turning a profit, and in 1836 he had himself transferred to work in a home located on the Aqueduto das ÁguasLivres, the Aqueduct of the Free Waters. Less than a half a mile long, the waterway allowed suburbanites and rural farmers to traverse the rural landscape from above, making their way into the city of Lisbon.

It was along this route that many of these unsuspecting commuters met DiogoAlves. Despite the fact that many of the workers who traveled long and far to reach the city were no more than humble farmers entering Lisbon to sell off their harvests, Alves targeted them. Awaiting their return home, he met them by nightfall along the Aqueduct, where he would rob them of their earnings. Afterward, Alves would throw them over the edge of the 213-foot tall structure, sending them falling to their deaths. Between 1836 and 1839, he repeated this process some 70 times. Local police initially attributedthe deaths to copycat suicides, which led to a temporary closure of the bridge. While the killings on the Aqueduct may have come to a stop, break-ins began sprouting up among private residences after Alves formed a gang of murderous robbers to target the wealthier residents of the city. The group was caught while killing four people inside the home of a local doctor, and Alves was arrested and sentenced to death by hanging.

Many regard Alves as the country’s first serial killer, and the last person to die by hanging, but this simply isn’t the case. A woman named Luisa de Jesus, who admitted to poisoning 28 children, is the first recorded serial killer in Portugal and was whipped, hanged, and burned in the streets of Lisbon for her crimes in 1772. Alves, who was hanged to death in February of 1841, may have been among the last people to die as a result of capital punishment before the country did away with the practice in 1867, but he wasn’t the last: Around half a dozen people followed him. Still, what was it about Alves that compelled scientists to preserve his head in a glass jar? For the most part, it was all about trends and timing. At the time of Alves’ execution, phrenology — the belief that certain mental or character traits were determined by the shape of one’s skull — was taking off. While the “laws” undergirding the discipline have since been debunked, researchers at the time were all too excited by the possibility that they might be able to understand what could make a person like Alves so undeniably evil.

As such, his head was removed from his already lifeless body and moved into the glass jar where it can still be found in today, perfectly preserved for all to see. Not much is known about the result of the study on Alves, as little recorded evidence, if there ever was any, remains. A second skull, which belonged to Francisco Mattos Lobo, who murdered a family of four before throwing their dog out of a window, was examined just one year after Alves’ death, in April of 1842.His head can be found in its own glass jar, housed right down the hall from that of DiogoAlves.

Q1.How DiogoAlves is assumed to be living on to this day even after he got executed in 1841?

Similar questions