Kamlesh was convicted for rigging of votes in the last election. Mukesh was held guilty for practising untouchability. The court did not allow either of them to contest for the elections. Does this decision go against the principle of democratic elections? Give reasons commenting on the cases of both Kamlesh and Mukesh.
Answers
Answer:
The phrase "Kamlesh was convicted for rigging of votes in the last election. Mukesh was held guilty for practising untouchability. The court did not allow either of them to contest for the elections. Does this decision go against the principle of democratic elections? Give reasons commenting on the cases of both Kamlesh and Mukesh." Kamlesh OR was OR convicted OR for OR rigging OR of OR votes OR in OR the OR last OR election. OR Mukesh OR was OR held OR guilty OR for OR practising OR untouchability. OR The OR court OR did OR not OR allow OR either OR of OR them OR to OR contest OR for OR the OR elections. OR Does OR this OR decision OR go OR against OR the OR principle OR of OR democratic OR elections? OR Give OR reasons OR commenting OR on OR the OR cases OR of OR both OR Kamlesh OR and OR Mukesh.