Social Sciences, asked by tanishmukherjee, 1 year ago

Kerala with lower per capita income has a better Human Development ranking than Punjab hence per capita income is not a useful criteria to all and should not be used to compare States do you agree discuss​

Answers

Answered by riya4865
6

Explanation:

Yes, I agree that money income or per capita income is not the only factor. Factors like Infant Mortality Rate, Literacy Rate and Net Attendance ratio are also very crucial for overall human development. In these factors Kerala is better than Punjab.

(a) Infant Mortality Rate in Kerala was 11 as compared to 49 in Punjab (in the year 2003).

(b) Literacy Rate (%) was 91 in Kerala as compared to 70 in Punjab (in the year 2001)

c) Net Attendance Ratio from class I to V was 91 in Kerala as compared to 81 in Punjab (in 1995-96).

Due to these advantages, Kerala has a

better human development ranking than Punjab, in spite of lower per capita income.

Hope it helps you


tanishmukherjee: jharkhand
tanishmukherjee: you
riya4865: mum bai
tanishmukherjee: ooo
tanishmukherjee: nice to meet you riya
tanishmukherjee: okay bye....
riya4865: same here
riya4865: bbye
riya4865: your friend so weird
riya4865: he is asking me to follow him
Answered by rafaelnadalbangtan
3

Answer:

Yes, I agree that money income or per capita income is not the only factor. Factors like Infant Mortality Rate, Literacy Rate and Net Attendance ratio are also very crucial for overall human development. In these factors Kerala is better than Punjab.(a) Infant Mortality Rate in Kerala was 11 as compared to 49 in Punjab (in the year 2003).(b) Literacy Rate (%) was 91 in Kerala as compared to 70 in Punjab (in the year 2001)c) Net Attendance Ratio from class I to V was 91 in Kerala as compared to 81 in Punjab (in 1995-96).Due to these advantages, Kerala has a better human development ranking than Punjab, in spite of lower per capita income.

Similar questions