Kerala, with lower per capita income has a better human development ranking than Maharashtra. Hence, per capita income is not a useful criterion at all and should not be used to compare states. Do you agree?
Answers
Answered by
8
Thus so
I don't agree as
↪ per capita income tells us about the current development of the state or country
↪ its true that average income should not be considered as criterion but to get the reports from the world bank it needs to be used .
↪ the other factors such as net attendance ratio literacy rate are also important when we compare them in deep .
↪ thus the statement is somewhat yes also as per capita income sometimes become hard for the citizens .
Hope it helps
Mark as brainliest if helpful .
I don't agree as
↪ per capita income tells us about the current development of the state or country
↪ its true that average income should not be considered as criterion but to get the reports from the world bank it needs to be used .
↪ the other factors such as net attendance ratio literacy rate are also important when we compare them in deep .
↪ thus the statement is somewhat yes also as per capita income sometimes become hard for the citizens .
Hope it helps
Mark as brainliest if helpful .
Answered by
3
I am agree because the per capita income coming on the basis of per capita income only we differentiate the states and the countries so if the per capita income is different of one state or a one country so the country who is having less and least per capita income it is the poor country or state but if the per capita income of a country or a state is more then the country or state will be richer
Similar questions