Question

Kerala, with lower per capita income has a better human development ranking than Maharashtra. Hence, per capita income is not a useful criterion at all and should not be used to compare states. Do you agree? DiscussNCERT Class XSocial Studies - Understanding Economic DevelopmentChapter _Development

Answer 1

No, I do not agree with the statement that per capita income is not a useful criterion at all. Kerala, with low per capita income has a better human development ranking than Maharashtra because human development ranking is determined using a combination of factors such as health, education and income. So, this does not imply that per capita income is not useful. Rather, per capita income is one of the major developmental factors and cannot be ignored. The World Bank uses per capita income as the criterion for measuring development and comparing states. But this criterion has certain limitations because of which determination of Human Development Index (HDI) is done using this criterion along with some other development factors like health, education etc. Thus per capita income is a useful criterion for comparison among states.

Answer 2

Answer:

Explanations:

This is true because the literacy rate , infant mortality rate , health care facilities etc better than Kerala in comparison to Haryana . The per capita income is only calculated the average income of the state irrespective of any other factor .