kerala with lower per capita income has a better human development ranking than haryana hence per capita income is a useful criterion at all and should not be used to compare states Do you agree Discuss
Answers
Answered by
4
Answer:
Kerala, with lower per capita income has a better human development ranking than Haryana because, human development ranking is determined using a combination of factors such as health, education, and income. So, this does not imply that per capita income is not useful
Answered by
2
Answer:
Kerela with lower per capita income has a better human development ranking than Maharashtra because Kerela focused more on providing basic facilities to its citizens.
However,it would be wrong to say that,per capita income is not a useful criterion.
Per capita income tells us about the average income of the states.
Even,though per capita income has its limitations,but it cannot be neglected from being taken as criterion to compare states.
Per capita along with other criterions like literacy rate,infant mortality rate and net attendence ratio can be used to measure the development of different states.
Hope it helps u!!!
Similar questions