Kiran regularly visits a Vishnu temple one day on his way to temple he meets Shyam who asks him what is the need to especially go to temple if GOD in his impersonal aspect,is present in space trees and all beings?"Shyam is more interested in pious work. Write on how Kiran can refute Shyama arguments from BG 12.1 - 7
Answers
Brain cannot be donated
ask plzz
I hope its helps you
And don't forget to mark as braonliest
Be careless to ask anything we are there to help you mate...
Mark as brainliest if it helps u dear
┏─━─━─━─━∞◆∞━─━─━─━─┓
✭✮ ӇƠƤЄ ƖƬ ӇЄԼƤ MƛƳ ƳƠƲ ✭✮
MARK AS BRAINLIST
┗─━─━─━─━∞◆∞━─━─━─━─┛
From the Bhagavad Gita: Chapter 12, Verse 1-7 the following points can be used by way of Kiran to refute Shyam's argument.
1. God is both in personal and impersonal form when you consider that he is everywhere.
2. But the clear cognizance of God is received when we are close to him in the temple.
3. Shree Krishna has stated that devotees of his non-public structure are higher than these worshiping the impersonal form. two
4. In the temple, we use our senses to the fullest recognition of God. We see God, hear the chanting of his identify and so the thought is in a position to without problems connect to God and meditate on him.
5. So traveling temple brings us closer to God.