English, asked by Apurva77, 1 year ago

knowledge gained through experience is far superior to and many times more useful than theoretical knowledge. Discuss.


Anonymous: we have to discuss in simple words or not
Apurva77: yes in simple words

Answers

Answered by Safwaan127
8
There always had been an ongoing debate about the comparative importance of knowledge and experience. While according to one view knowledge is all pervasive and in the absence of knowledge experience by itself is nothing, but a process of trial and error. The other view on the other hand avers that knowledge without experience is of little or no use due to its fickleness. The debate became more widespread after theories and concepts of management especially human resource or people’s role became more prominent. Before going down deeply into this debate, let us first know what in simple or in common language knowledge and experience mean.


Knowledge
The quality of knowing or having awareness about specific areas of human life, prevalent systems, processes, happenings and matters of importance to humans, obtained formally or informally, intentionally or unintentionally through the use of senses, books or experience, the ability to anticipate and provide rationale for the happenings, sum total or the extent of all the above may be described as knowledge. There is no doubt that knowledge gained through a formal and specified process of education has much more validity than the one gained by a process of observation or self –learning, but it cannot be excluded from the definition of knowledge.

Here's Your Answer
Hope it Helps
Cheers , Have a amazing day :)

Safwaan127: Do u get it?
Apurva77: the answer u wrote before was more better
Safwaan127: ok wait.. I'll bring in that too..
Safwaan127: but u didn't ask in that sense that i wrote before..
Safwaan127: Thats why i changed it
Apurva77: ok no prbl
Answered by dineshsahu8024
18

There always had been an ongoing debate about the comparative importance of knowledge and experience. While according to one view knowledge is all pervasive and in the absence of knowledge experience by itself is nothing, but a process of trial and error. The other view on the other hand avers that knowledge without experience is of little or no use due to its fickleness. The debate became more widespread after theories and concepts of management especially human resource or people’s role became more prominent. Before going down deeply into this debate, let us first know what in simple or in common language knowledge and experience mean.

Knowledge

The quality of knowing or having awareness about specific areas of human life, prevalent systems, processes, happenings and matters of importance to humans, obtained formally or informally, intentionally or unintentionally through the use of senses, books or experience, the ability to anticipate and provide rationale for the happenings, sum total or the extent of all the above may be described as knowledge. There is no doubt that knowledge gained through a formal and specified process of education has much more validity than the one gained by a process of observation or self –learning, but it cannot be excluded from the definition of knowledge.

Here's Your Answer

Hope it Helps

Cheers , Have a amazing day :)

Similar questions