Social Sciences, asked by namrtahrh, 9 months ago

list any three ways in which the lives of farmers and herders would have been different from that of hunters and gatherers

please help me I will thanks u and mark answer as BRAINLIEST​

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
3

Answer:

Farmers and herders would stay in huts or houses, whereas hunter-gatherers would stay in caves. For farmers and herders, the food source would be crops and domesticated animals like sheep, goat; whereas hunters would rely on wild animals as a source of food.

The three ways which show that the lives of farmers and herders would have been different from that of hunter-gatherers are :

1. Farmers and herders mostly live a settled life while as hunter-gatherers would always wonder from place to place in search of food.

2. Farmers and herders mostly depended on agriculture and domestication of animals for their livelihood while as hunter-gathers depended on hunting of wild animals and plants.

3. Farmers and herders live in huts and thatched houses while as hunter-gatherers live in caves.

Answered by anuskasen62
2

Answer:

Three ways in which the lives of farmers and herders would have been different from hunt-gatherers are:

• Hunt-gatherers keep moving from place to place in search of food while farmers and herders grow their food from their living place.

• Hunt-gatherers did not build any permanent houses mostly they live in caves while farmers and herders build huts and houses.

• Hunt-gatherers had no role in protecting animals and plants while famers and herders protect animals and plants.

Similar questions
Math, 4 months ago