Marna is researching the United States Supreme Court case Bush v. Gore. Which of the following sources should she avoid because it is not credible?
Answers
Answer: the answer is D the one that has Wikipedia in it
Explanation:
Wikipedia is not a credible source and anyone can edit the information
Answer:
Marna should avoid Wikipedia since it is not a credible source of information and anyone can edit it.
- Wikipedia is not a trustworthy source for references on other Wikipedia pages. Since it is a user-generated source, anybody can update it at any moment, and whatever information it includes at any one time may be inaccurate, the result of vandalism, a work in progress, or both.
- Because it permits various people to edit, Wikipedia is not a trustworthy source because it cannot be assumed that the information offered there have been verified before being published.
- The majority of academics concur that you shouldn't use Wikipedia as a source in your academic work, and several colleges forbid it. This is due in part to doubts about its dependability and a secondary source's status.
Thus the answer is Wikipedia.
Refer here to learn more about Wikipedia: https://brainly.in/question/18858185
Refer here to learn more about Credible source: https://brainly.in/question/26139020
#SPJ3
Here's the full question- Marna is researching the United States Supreme Court case Bush v. Gore. Which of the following sources should she avoid because it is not credible? Too Close to Call: The Thirty-Six-Day Battle to Decide the 2000 Election, a book by a legal scholar about Bush v. Gore http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-949.ZPC.html, a site that has the full text of the Bush v. Gore decision http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/20/us/bush-v-gore-a-special-report.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm, a New York Times article about the case http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v. Gore, a free encyclopedia that is written jointly by anonymous volunteers and can be edited by anyone​