mention any two drawbacks in classifying organisms under the old two kingdom classification
Answers
Answered by
4
Hey there!
=>> (i) The position of virus is not clear.
(ii) Kingdom Protista includes organisms having diverse form, structure and life cycle, hence does not seem to be proper grouping.
(iii) Some organisms included under Protista (e.g. Dinoflagellates) are not eukaryotic rather mesokaryotic.
(iv) Slime moulds placed under Protista differ considerably from the rest of protists.
Hope it helped!☺️
=>> (i) The position of virus is not clear.
(ii) Kingdom Protista includes organisms having diverse form, structure and life cycle, hence does not seem to be proper grouping.
(iii) Some organisms included under Protista (e.g. Dinoflagellates) are not eukaryotic rather mesokaryotic.
(iv) Slime moulds placed under Protista differ considerably from the rest of protists.
Hope it helped!☺️
Answered by
2
haekels 3 kingdom classification
he could not distinguish between prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms
photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic
unicellular and multicellular
Copeland's 4 kingdom classification
the didn't place fungi in a seperate kingdom
please mark it as a brainliest
he could not distinguish between prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms
photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic
unicellular and multicellular
Copeland's 4 kingdom classification
the didn't place fungi in a seperate kingdom
please mark it as a brainliest
Similar questions