Geography, asked by omm205, 1 year ago

mention any two inventions to distinguish between 'science' and 'meaningful science' ?

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
31
Science is meaningful indeed.

What's more meaningful than science? I don't see anything.

No you can't blame Alfred Nobel for his invention. We turned that against each other. Otherwise, it was done with best intention.

Failed experiments doesn't fills this category of meaning less or bad science. Yes, science for all the wrong reasons do make the list, but that happens more in the movies than in real science.

What's more important is whether it's interesting or not. This will raise eyebrows since science seems to be interesting for everyone.

But wait, i recently saw an online article reading something like “Are theoretical physicist fooling around/ are we wasting best minds in theoretical physics?

See, experiments look beautiful and interesting while theories only attract a handful of group. Yet we have the most popular scientists from theoretical background like Einstein, Newton, etc.

This is possibly because of the successful results. A successful experiment gets applauded while failed ones are for pure rant business. And the theories mostly go unnoticed in the mass.

But for a science guy, this question doesn't exists.

hope it helps..
Answered by tanuprasad29
45
science is meaningful indeed .is not is that true Sciences meaningful when people are there to and repeat it used to regularly .to make science meaningful we need to isolate tools that provide science to the masses of the people .in my own consideration those tools communication tools which would down
Similar questions