Movements do not need a strong leadership. Explain the statement by giving reasons.
Answers
Answered by
37
The present times are witnessing the wholly new sort of movements, also referred to as leaderless movements. Amongst the greatest misconceptions when you seek communal change is that communal change and communal movements require potent leaders.
Foremost, an equal sign must not be put between leadership and captivating leaders. It’s very practical for a movement or a nation to have charming leaders.
Then, there are movements that have a more representative task of leadership. An example is Nelson Mandela.
Coming to a leaderless movement, it’s one where the leadership is sort of hidden, and people are not keen on being seen.
Whatever the reason behind such movements, movements don’t have charismatic leaders any more.
Foremost, an equal sign must not be put between leadership and captivating leaders. It’s very practical for a movement or a nation to have charming leaders.
Then, there are movements that have a more representative task of leadership. An example is Nelson Mandela.
Coming to a leaderless movement, it’s one where the leadership is sort of hidden, and people are not keen on being seen.
Whatever the reason behind such movements, movements don’t have charismatic leaders any more.
Similar questions