Mr. Prasanth, the founder and CEO of Aditya Pharma Limited faced a dilemma with regard
recruitment decision. Aditya pharma limited will commence commercial production from
April 2013 and the company will need pharmacists with hands on experience of at least one year
to take up the jobs in April, 2013. Mr. Prasanth sought the advice of HR department to select a
specific source of recruitment as well as the time period to take up recruitment.
HR department of the company is divided on the issue. The head of human resource
development (HRD) centre advised to start recruitment in January, 2012, employ the selected
candidates by the end of March 2012 and train them in the HRD centre for a year. He further
opted for the campus recruitment. The assistant HR manager in charge of compensation
management advised to source the candidates from the existing pharma companies and start
the recruitment in January, 2013 and complete the employment process by the end of March
2013.
The chief of the HR department of the view that the jobs of pharmacists can be outsourced to
one or two of the existing pharma companies experiencing the problem of over staffing.
HR department could not solve the issue. However, they provided all these alternatives to the
CEO along with the pros and cons of each alternative.
Questions:
(a) Would be satisfied with the approach of the HR department, if you were the founder and CEO of
the company?
(b) How do you decide up on the issue, if you were the founder and the CEO of the company?
Answers
Answer:
hwmw7eeeheiehmrryr8rbrueiessys9seege9eegeoshl
Explanation:
bjw7hejekeieheekeueuheevenej hebe heehehee eje ehege euwe 3hu3 3he egw eye this code language find it i have sended it find
if you have luck you can find
Answer:
a) Yes I would be satisfied withe the approach of HR department.
b) If I were the CEO. I may have solved the issue based of the advices.
Explanation:
a) The HR department came with three intresting ideas which can solve the issue. The head of human resources department adviced to start campus drives and recruit freshers, then train them as experts. The idea is intresting as it will increase the employment opportunities. The HR managers idea of taking experienced candidates can reduce the loss of time for training. Finally the chief of HR department advices to take over staffing company staff and thus it may help staff from loosing their jobs. All the three ideas are beneficial in their own way. Thus I will be satisfied with the advices.
b) If I were the CEO, I may have gone with Head of human resources department's idea. Taking freshers by conducting campus drive and increasing manpower will be more beneficial to the company. By training the freshers, they may become experts in a short time as I can hire enthusiastic people. Thus I may have solved the issue.