Biology, asked by vj80235, 11 months ago

murgi phele ayi ya anda explain ​


seemajhafea17: murgi

Answers

Answered by manasiriya2003
3

according to some of the scientist murgi Pehle aayi thi but some of the scientist also believes that egg was the one which came first but now also there is not such evidence that who came first and who came last that's why we can only say you that keep researching......✌✌


vj80235: how to become scientist in one day
manasiriya2003: No one can become a scientist in one day because it requires hard work experience knowledge and even it requires certain degrees or even PHD
manasiriya2003: If someone really want to become a scientist so they may try to solve sum of the mysteries which are not solve by a currently specialised scientist
vj80235: acha
manasiriya2003: Ok bye
vj80235: nhi mujhe scientist nhi bnna
vj80235: mere friend ko bnna h
manasiriya2003: ok that's good bye
vj80235: ok tata bye bye
vj80235: and good morning in advance
Answered by vatsalyagautam790
3

Neither. And both. This is a false dichotomy.

You see, there is no such thing as a chicken, nor is there such thing as a chicken egg.

Let me explain.

Chickens aren't a static thing. They evolve over time. They are constantly changing.

So are their eggs and the contents of those eggs, too.

Many millions of years ago, there was a dinosaur. It looked vaguely chicken-like, but it had teeth and claws on its "wings." If you saw one at night, you might briefly mistake it for a chicken.

Over time, though, this creature changed. Its teeth disappeared, as did the claws on its wings. It gained the ability to fly, and then lost it again.

At what point did it become a chicken? It still isn't a chicken, remember? There is no such thing as a chicken.

The eggs you buy at the store come from a small dinosaur that is still in the process of becoming what it will eventually become. It is the first of its kind. It is the last of its kind. Its children will not be chickens, any more than it is.

They are beasts on the spectrum, categorized by we humans as "chicken" but no more chicken than dinosaur or incredibly advanced amphibian or hyper-evolved protozoa.

There was no first chicken. There was no first egg. We could arbitrarily draw the line anywhere we wanted to, summarily deeming that this is the first chicken or the first egg.

But, in the end, that decision would be arbitrary. The creature we are about to eat is what it is, regardless of where we draw that line. And, this is important, the being just on the other side of that line, regardless of where we draw it, is more "chicken" than any other creature. If you were to see one, you'd say, "that's a chicken". Either that, or we've drawn the line so far from what we think of as "chicken" that the creatures on both sides would fail this simple test.

False dichotomies of this kind are common. Which is better, conservative or liberal? Answer: yes. Which is worse, rape or murder? Answer: no.

Life is far more complex than "yes" or "no" and "better" and "worse." Expand your mind and see the world as it is: a spectrum of existence.

Cheers.

-Vatsalya


vj80235: thanks for answering me
vatsalyagautam790: My father is from India.
vatsalyagautam790: And he knows the basic hindi.
vatsalyagautam790: Dude mark my answer as the brainliest.
vj80235: good bye bro
vatsalyagautam790: I spent so much time answering it though.
debjoym: ok i can thank u...
vatsalyagautam790: Ok buddy goodbye. It's about 6 pm here.
vatsalyagautam790: So I am going for a walk.
debjoym: bye...
Similar questions