Must every democracy have the same institutions and values ?
Answers
But there is some basic things which are required in every government
There must be equality
There must be freedom
Power must be shared among more than two institution.etc
Answer:
Explanation:
All democracies need not to have same institutions.
Introduction:
A look at any of the standard data sets on the history of political institutions reveals some distinct patterns. First, in some countries we see long-standing commitments to open elections and constraints on executive authority nthe hallmarks of democratic institutions. These arrangements go largely unchal-lenged and the policies/rulers chosen through these institutions are accepted with little or no protest.
Second, in certain nations at the other end of the spectrum, elections serve as at best a veneer of legitimacy for dictators and single-party systems, and the authority of incumbents is not restrained by judicial or parliamentary institutions.
Thirdly, some nations straddle the line between democracy and autocracy; their transition is marked by protests and institutional backsliding. Periodically, these nations struggle to embed institutional change, but every now and then, a nation forges ahead on a new path that propels it into one of the more stable groupings.
Facts on Political Change and Values:
Executive restrictions are rated on a seven-point scale, and we depict the percentage of nations that receive the highest score each year anticipating our model where the choice of executive constraints is binary.We exhibit the percentage of nations with the greatest executive recruiting openness score—reserved for systems where the chief executive is directly elected or appointed—which is scored on a four-point scale.
The Core Model:
Our fundamental structure is entirely dynamic. A current leader decides whether to place strict executive limitations on herself during each time, which would reduce her ability to profit from holding office.There is no obligation on successors to uphold the institutions they inherit.Strong executive restrictions may nevertheless be selected since they spare the incumbent ruler the expense of trying to quell protests by "concerned" individuals who support robust institutions.The proportion of such citizens is the only dynamic component in the model.
Foreign influence:
In the model that has been discussed thus far, institutions and values co evolve in the course of a polity's own history.Institutional rules, however, can also be imposed from without.History is rife with instances where a nation's interdependence affects another nation's economy and polity.
Colonial roots
Colonialism is a key illustration of foreign influence. Colonial powers set governance laws that differed in how much they permitted open executive recruitments and tight executive restraints.
Determinants of Values:
Our model offers a fresh viewpoint on the connection between reliance on natural resources and the adoption of stringent executive limitations.The model predicts that, all other things being equal, nations with high public revenues (in the form of natural resources) will need high democratic principles to start along a path toward heavy executive constraints.This implies that historical resource discoveries may have been made at crucial times
Conclusion:
We have created a model that includes a two-way interaction between co evolving values and institutions in order to investigate developing democratic values.The percentage of people who have democratic principles that are strong enough to make them willing to protect democratic institutions is the only state variable in this model.Because they care, these citizens are more likely to detest non-democratic institutions, and this resentment encourages the spread of democratic values across the populace.
#SPJ2