Question

narrative review is limited to biased data selection​

Answer 1

Answer:

Involve explicit description of what types of studies are to be included to limit selection bias on behalf of the reviewer; explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria for primary studies; tables reporting salient features of each article with expert synthesis, discussion and agreement by two or more reviewers.

Answer 2

At its most basic, narrative reviews are most helpful for getting a broad perspective on a subject

• usually a lot of love a textbook chapter as well as sections on the physiology and/or medical speciality of a topic.
• once reading and evaluating a narrative review, detain mind that the author's bias might or might not be present.
• The labels Narrative Review and Literature Review are often describing a similar form of review.
• For scientific purposes, the term Literature Review is the one used most often.

Limitations of narrative literature review:

• The nature of the strategy that's too subjective (in the determination of which studies to include, the means the studies are analyzed, and also the conclusions drawn)
• A narrative review is the kind of freshman faculty students usually learn as a general approach.
• Its purpose is to determine a couple of studies that describe a drag of interest.
• Narrative reviews haven't any planned analysis question or specified search strategy, solely a subject of interest.
• At a lay level, they appear to be used interchangeably.
• However, at the academic/scientific level, a 'narrative review' is a literature review and a 'descriptive review' could be a systematic review.
• A scientific review is a lot of rigorous review of existing literature.

#SPJ3