Nate
claims
56
is
a
rectangular
number
because
a
rectangle
with
base
4
and
height
14
can
be
formed.
What
is
his
error?
Answers
Answered by
8
First of all writing like this can be a problem
and secondly, by the definition of rectangular numbers x = n (n+1)
4 and 14 don't fit the formula
and secondly, by the definition of rectangular numbers x = n (n+1)
4 and 14 don't fit the formula
Similar questions
Physics,
8 months ago
Social Sciences,
8 months ago
English,
8 months ago
Chemistry,
1 year ago
English,
1 year ago