Question

nes Mill divided Indian History into three periods- Hindu, Muslim and Christi
British thought, surveys were important for effective administration,
770 A terrible famine killed 10 million people in Bengal.
tiny means - When soldiers as a group disobey their officers in the army.
ngal Pandey was hanged for attacking his officer in Barracpore.
dicines to treat cancer is a human-made resource,
dic resources are derived from living things.
mbers of the Rajya Sabha are elected for a fixed tenure, of five years.
ne Minister presides over the meeting of Lok Sabha.
Gandhi is the permanent Chairman of the Constitution Assembly.​

Answer 1

Answer:

The British believed that by preserving official documents it would have been easier for them or to know about the decisions taken in the past.James mill divided Indian history into Hinduism and Muslim and British periods.

The British believed that by preserving official documents it would have been easier for them or to know about the decisions taken in the past.James mill divided Indian history into Hinduism and Muslim and British periods.This periodisation is based on the religious line that there was a face for which the Hindu were the rulers and other work ruled.

The British believed that by preserving official documents it would have been easier for them or to know about the decisions taken in the past.James mill divided Indian history into Hinduism and Muslim and British periods.This periodisation is based on the religious line that there was a face for which the Hindu were the rulers and other work ruled.Then came the face of the Muslims and Britishers i.e. Christians. He had a colonial mind and thought asians to have poorly civilized. He felt Europeans to be superior.

The British believed that by preserving official documents it would have been easier for them or to know about the decisions taken in the past.James mill divided Indian history into Hinduism and Muslim and British periods.This periodisation is based on the religious line that there was a face for which the Hindu were the rulers and other work ruled.Then came the face of the Muslims and Britishers i.e. Christians. He had a colonial mind and thought asians to have poorly civilized. He felt Europeans to be superior.So , infact, through this periodisation he tried to divide the people with their own specific identity which was not a correct.

The British believed that by preserving official documents it would have been easier for them or to know about the decisions taken in the past.James mill divided Indian history into Hinduism and Muslim and British periods.This periodisation is based on the religious line that there was a face for which the Hindu were the rulers and other work ruled.Then came the face of the Muslims and Britishers i.e. Christians. He had a colonial mind and thought asians to have poorly civilized. He felt Europeans to be superior.So , infact, through this periodisation he tried to divide the people with their own specific identity which was not a correct.During the Muslim and British they were were thousands of Hindu and Muslim princely states.

The British believed that by preserving official documents it would have been easier for them or to know about the decisions taken in the past.James mill divided Indian history into Hinduism and Muslim and British periods.This periodisation is based on the religious line that there was a face for which the Hindu were the rulers and other work ruled.Then came the face of the Muslims and Britishers i.e. Christians. He had a colonial mind and thought asians to have poorly civilized. He felt Europeans to be superior.So , infact, through this periodisation he tried to divide the people with their own specific identity which was not a correct.During the Muslim and British they were were thousands of Hindu and Muslim princely states.So , this is not a proper periodisation of Indian history.

The British believed that by preserving official documents it would have been easier for them or to know about the decisions taken in the past.James mill divided Indian history into Hinduism and Muslim and British periods.This periodisation is based on the religious line that there was a face for which the Hindu were the rulers and other work ruled.Then came the face of the Muslims and Britishers i.e. Christians. He had a colonial mind and thought asians to have poorly civilized. He felt Europeans to be superior.So , infact, through this periodisation he tried to divide the people with their own specific identity which was not a correct.During the Muslim and British they were were thousands of Hindu and Muslim princely states.So , this is not a proper periodisation of Indian history.James mill must have divided our history into Hindu , Muslim and British as in medieval and before India was ruled by Hindu rulers after that Foriegn rulers following different religions especially Muslim and after that the Britishers took India's control.

The Britishers practiced the art of survey because they wanted to administer India. To achieve this it was necessary for them to know India thoroughly. This led to use of survey by them

The Britishers practiced the art of survey because they wanted to administer India. To achieve this it was necessary for them to know India thoroughly. This led to use of survey by themThe British thought surveys were important for effective administration.

Hope this had help you

Pl mark me as brainliest please