English, asked by dibakar2982, 5 hours ago

no time to turn at beauty's glance and watch her feet how they dance name the figures of the speech needed urgently
class 6​

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
0

Answer:

zid8130194169,p1234 sexgirls.

Answered by XxterijanemanxX
0

Answer:

We have no time to stand and stare.

Explanation:

Aesthetic judgments of beauty:-

People need only a glimpse to make some judgments. A less-than-100-ms presentation suffices to judge the basic-level content of a scene or the attractiveness of a face (Greene & Oliva, 2009; Willis & Todorov, 2006). However, given the social and evolutionary importance of basic categories and facial attractiveness, these tasks could be special cases. Facial attractiveness is usually studied apart from other forms of aesthetic judgment, like beauty. 

The mechanisms underlying judgments about the beauty or other aesthetic properties have only recently been subjected to systematic empirical investigation (for reviews see Leder, 2013; Pelowski, Markey, Lauring, & Leder, 2016; Starr, 2013). Some models for the processes underlying aesthetic experiences and judgments have been proposed (Pelowski et al., 2016). One salient structural feature of all these models is that aesthetic judgments (e.g., about beauty) always necessitate a post-sensory, more deliberate stage of cognitive processing. This subsequent processing stage implies that the processing time for aesthetic evaluation should be longer than for a simple judgment of a basic perceptual property such as size or symmetry. In one experiment in which participants made precisely these judgments, an affirmative aesthetic rating (“yes, beautiful”) took about 120 ms longer than basic perceptual judgments (Jacobsen, Schubotz, Höfel, & Cramon, 2006). This raises the question of whether longer processing is only required for (highly) positive aesthetic evaluations, such as: “This is beautiful.” 

Philosophers have suggested, and it is widely believed, that beauty is different from other kinds of pleasure (Kant, 1790/2000; Santayana, 1896).

Similar questions