Not for nothing has Karunagaran prospered as a Data scientist since his arrival in Dallas 20 years ago a. No error b. Not for nothing did Karunagaran prosper as a Data scientist since his arrival in Dallas 20 years ago c. Not for nothing did Karunagaran prosper as a Data scientist since his arrival in Dallas 20 years back d. Not for nothing did Karunagaran prosper as a Data scientist since his arrived in Dallas 20 years ago Activa
Answers
There is no error in this sentence.
- The given sentence is correct because it has used correct forms of the verb.
- The difference in all the sentences is of the verb used, which is has or did.
- Has will only be used here because it is a sentence of past perfect tense and not simple past tense, so did will not be used here.
- Also, when we talk about some time in the past, we say these many years ago and never use the word these many years back.
- Option d is eliminated because it used his with arrived while with a verb, always a noun or pronoun is used and not his or her.
- In sentence c back word is used, hence it is eliminated.
- In sentence b, did is used hence it is eliminated and a is the only one left.
Hence, the correct option is a.
#SPJ2
Here is no error in this sentence.
The correct verb tenses were utilized in the example sentence, making it legitimate.
The verb used—has or did—makes a difference in each of the statements.
Did won't be used here; only has will be used because the statement is in the past perfect tense rather than the simple past tense.
Additionally, we never say these many years ago but rather these many years ago when discussing a time in the past.
Because option d used his with arrived rather than a noun or pronoun, which is always used with verbs instead of his or her, it is no longer acceptable.
Back word is not used in sentence c; therefore, it is removed.
As a result of the usage of did in sentence b, it is deleted, leaving only a.
As a result, A is the best choice
#SPJ5
https://brainly.in/question/34078086