Paragraph on is the present day student highly pamperad
Answers
Answered by
46
The student community comprises a very important section of the civilization. Students are the expectation of the future; they will be the ones carrying all the duties tomorrow. However, the representation of the typical student of nowadays makes one imagine whether he has grown-up too for his boots.
The increasing rowdiness and conflict among the current students, their acts of hooliganism, destruction and their free outlook towards the whole thing in living have lead a few people to think that students are not being handheld appropriately.
The current students obtain the whole thing on a serving dish. His parents coddle him by fulfilling all his wants. He has no reason to be anxious about his transportation, his foodstuff, garments, books and other necessities. He gets the finest of all that he likes or needs. The students of the past were hard-working, diligent and submissive and dedicated his consideration to his studies. He relied on himself. On the opposing the present-day student is simple going, and resorts to easy ways of fleeting the exams.
But can we culpability the student for what he is today? Admittedly he is coddled. His parents and the government release the responsibilities towards him in educating him. But these powers that be do not take correct steps to see that he turns out to be a disciplined resident. The society at large also is to blame for the effortless going, care freeways of the students of nowadays. The present society itself is unmanageable; unless there is discipline in the society as a whole, we cannot anticipate having regulation in a certain part of the society.
I HOPE IT HELP U
MARK ME BRAINLIEST
The increasing rowdiness and conflict among the current students, their acts of hooliganism, destruction and their free outlook towards the whole thing in living have lead a few people to think that students are not being handheld appropriately.
The current students obtain the whole thing on a serving dish. His parents coddle him by fulfilling all his wants. He has no reason to be anxious about his transportation, his foodstuff, garments, books and other necessities. He gets the finest of all that he likes or needs. The students of the past were hard-working, diligent and submissive and dedicated his consideration to his studies. He relied on himself. On the opposing the present-day student is simple going, and resorts to easy ways of fleeting the exams.
But can we culpability the student for what he is today? Admittedly he is coddled. His parents and the government release the responsibilities towards him in educating him. But these powers that be do not take correct steps to see that he turns out to be a disciplined resident. The society at large also is to blame for the effortless going, care freeways of the students of nowadays. The present society itself is unmanageable; unless there is discipline in the society as a whole, we cannot anticipate having regulation in a certain part of the society.
I HOPE IT HELP U
MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Answered by
12
One of the thorniest questions before the country today is that of indiscipline among the students. Hardly a day passes when we do not hear students setting authority at naught and taking the law into their own hands. Strikes have become their normal tool. All this has led some people to believe that the student of today is not being handled properly. He is being humoured, flattered and even pampered, otherwise he should not have been as naughty and intractable as he is.
The absence of corporal punishment at the school stage has turned the students' head. The student of yesterday was subjected to a stern discipline for ten years. The rod was freely employed in cases of delinquency, and the fear of this effective weapon kept him in proper trim. He bowed to authority.
In fact he used to be beaten into shape. Today, however, the rod has been banned by orders of the educational authorities. The teachers and the headmasters feel quite helpless because they are now unarmed. The students do as they like. They may revere a teacher here and a teacher there put by a and large they are disrespectful and even defiant.
The student of yesterday gave all his time to studies. He was devoted to his books. The introduction of the cinema has distracted his attention. No concrete steps have been taken to wean him from this distracting entertainment. Rather, films are being shown in schools and colleges under the guise of audiovisual education. He is being pampered and petted whereas the need of the day is to restrain him from his wasteful and vicious habit.
The student of yesterday depended on his own efforts and resources. He studied several books for his examinations, and that helped him in understanding the subjects. The student of today has been provided with short cuts and guides, cribs and bazar-notes. Everything is presented to him, cut-and-dried, as if on a platter. He has grown mentally lethargic and nothing is being done to arrest this growing lethargy. All this and much more like the patronage of the students' Unions has given rise to the feeling that the modern student is being pampered to an undesirable and even dangerous extent.
But we cannot put the hands of the clock backward. Circumstances have changed and we cannot apply nineteenth-century methods to solve twentieth century problems. The rod has been dismissed as a relic of barbarous times. It negates human dignity. It is contrary to the basic principle of democracy. It should therefore go, lock, stock and barrel. The student should be handled with sympathy, understanding and affection and he is bound to respond. If an appeal is made to his dignity and self- respect it must have a greater and profounder and more lasting effect. Educational psychologists have tried these methods with remarkable success.
There is nothing wrong with the cinema as such. What is needed is a discriminating use of it. Cinema and the radio are powerful educators and their possibilities should be exploited to the full.
Everybody, however, agrees that the notes and guides should be discouraged and even tabooed. One way of eliminating them is that the question papers should be so framed as to render them useless.
The modern student is not pampered. He has developed his wings in the free atmosphere of democracy and naturally he is more conscious of his rights than the student of yesterday. We should encourage him in asserting his rights and obtaining them.
The absence of corporal punishment at the school stage has turned the students' head. The student of yesterday was subjected to a stern discipline for ten years. The rod was freely employed in cases of delinquency, and the fear of this effective weapon kept him in proper trim. He bowed to authority.
In fact he used to be beaten into shape. Today, however, the rod has been banned by orders of the educational authorities. The teachers and the headmasters feel quite helpless because they are now unarmed. The students do as they like. They may revere a teacher here and a teacher there put by a and large they are disrespectful and even defiant.
The student of yesterday gave all his time to studies. He was devoted to his books. The introduction of the cinema has distracted his attention. No concrete steps have been taken to wean him from this distracting entertainment. Rather, films are being shown in schools and colleges under the guise of audiovisual education. He is being pampered and petted whereas the need of the day is to restrain him from his wasteful and vicious habit.
The student of yesterday depended on his own efforts and resources. He studied several books for his examinations, and that helped him in understanding the subjects. The student of today has been provided with short cuts and guides, cribs and bazar-notes. Everything is presented to him, cut-and-dried, as if on a platter. He has grown mentally lethargic and nothing is being done to arrest this growing lethargy. All this and much more like the patronage of the students' Unions has given rise to the feeling that the modern student is being pampered to an undesirable and even dangerous extent.
But we cannot put the hands of the clock backward. Circumstances have changed and we cannot apply nineteenth-century methods to solve twentieth century problems. The rod has been dismissed as a relic of barbarous times. It negates human dignity. It is contrary to the basic principle of democracy. It should therefore go, lock, stock and barrel. The student should be handled with sympathy, understanding and affection and he is bound to respond. If an appeal is made to his dignity and self- respect it must have a greater and profounder and more lasting effect. Educational psychologists have tried these methods with remarkable success.
There is nothing wrong with the cinema as such. What is needed is a discriminating use of it. Cinema and the radio are powerful educators and their possibilities should be exploited to the full.
Everybody, however, agrees that the notes and guides should be discouraged and even tabooed. One way of eliminating them is that the question papers should be so framed as to render them useless.
The modern student is not pampered. He has developed his wings in the free atmosphere of democracy and naturally he is more conscious of his rights than the student of yesterday. We should encourage him in asserting his rights and obtaining them.
Similar questions