Paulo makes the argument that the asteroid strike that likely contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs was a short-tem environmental change because it happened so quickly.
Which is the best analysis of Paulo’s position?
He is correct; it happened in just a few seconds.
He is correct; it did not cause any long-term changes.
He is incorrect; it caused long-term changes.
He is incorrect; impacts are not environmental changes
Answers
Answered by
3
He is correct; it happened in just few seconds
Answered by
1
Answer:
A) He is correct; it happened in just a few seconds.
Explanation:
Similar questions