Perhaps you wanted pizza for dinner, but was out voted by the rest of the family who wanted chili. This is similar to what happens in a community. One person has to give up a right for the good of the group. Sometimes citizens' duties and rights conflict with each other. A good example is a public protest. People have the right to meet in groups and share ideas. However, a protest can disrupt traffic or other normal activities. A city must provide extra police protection to keep people safe. Therefore, the city has the right to require permission in advance for a protest. Government must make laws to balance the rights of individuals and different groups of people.
How is the example of a public protest similar to the family dinner vote?
Both require government laws to maintain order and safety.
Both show conflict between the rights of individuals and groups.
Both explain why the rights of groups always win over individual wants.
Both demonstrate the downside of depending on voting to make decisions.
Answers
Answered by
1
lol you already answered it
Explanation:
1) both shows the individual rights
2) both shows the difference between the choices of people
3) both shows a sprit of voting and to win a majority
I just gave you some more points :)
Answered by
2
Answer:
(d) Both demonstrate the downside of depending on voting to make decisions .
We chose this answer because as we can see , in both the family dinner voting and public protest the choice that has been chosen by the majority of people is being acknowledged more greatly than a single individual's decision or choice . The fact that some people's opinion or choice , might go unnoticed is a downside of depending upon voting to make decisions .
Hope you find my answer useful!!!
Similar questions