periodic elections cannot be considered as a indicator of true democracy justify
Answers
Answered by
0
Periodic elections cannot be considered as a indicator of true democracy
Explanation:
- Electoral fundamentalism represents the strong conviction that democracy can not be formulated without elections and that elections are necessary and clear prerequisites for democratic thought. Instead of treating elections as an end of their own existence-a ideology with a meaning implicit of inalienable, political fundamentalists fail to treat elections as a form of civic engagement.
- This naive confidence in elections as the basis for democratic dominance can be seen most clearly in foreign diplomacy. In fragile nations, elections that have all forms of repercussions, including ethnic tensions, abuse, crimes and corruption, are of secondary importance
- Democratic fossil fuels are votes. Even if once, like oil for currencies, they gave a great boost to democracy, it turns out they generate their own gigantic problems. The Party sets itself as intermediaries between people and government at the fringes of the state apparatus and less. They had to vote every several years to raise their power and retain their positions.
- Elections have been turned into a media war for the voters. Trade and social media are both reinforcing one another by gathering and rebounding news to create a continuing, confounding climate. Hard competition, loss of advertising income and falling sales prompt the media to report increasingly vehement reports that relates to more and more exaggerated conflicts.
- National politics are becoming a soap opera for radio and TV and while producers have tremendous influence over their structure, writing and typeotic development, policymakers attempt, with differing standards of efficiency, to shift it in one or another way. The most famous politicians are those who can change the tale and reform the discourse-that is to say, those that will obey their media can.
- The election estimates are effective, authority must still be remembered, and the electoral system continually guarantees that the short-term and popular interest and the interests of the parties are lost. Elections have once been invented to enable democracy, but in these conditions they tend to be an obstruction.
- As voting has been reduced to the option of representatives & democratic representation has been reduced to a clear vote, there is a significant issue with a useful method. The next election is more important than maintaining the promises made last year.
To know more
What do you mean by free and fair periodic elections - Brainly.in
https://brainly.in/question/597307
Similar questions