Please answer as soon as possible. Please don't give any inapplicable answer bcz it leads to misconception. If you give a reasonable answer I'll surely mark it as BRAINLIEST.
Answers
Answer:
hi friend I can give u the body of letter it's here
So called green revolution has worked to design the system of crop production around the use of synthetic chemicals which dominates the vast majority of our tillable lands globally. The staple grains have been bred to be dwarves so that high fertilizer N can be used without lodging the crop. The heavy N makes the crop more susceptible to diseases such as bacterial leaf diseases and sucking insects. The answer then becomes more chemical in the form of insecticides and assorted pesticides both herbicides and fungicides mainly. The dynamic of this systematic approach is to maximize the issues related to chemical inputs. These chemicals were designed based on their toxicity. Nitrogen fertilizer was first the source of explosive. The chemical warfare agents becoming the source of agriculture insecticides. This occurred by no accident but by a master malevolent plan to control the global food system. Small wonder that dead marine zones are found at the mouths of rivers which travel through the agricultural zones. In North America the incidence of birth defects from the nitrates and estrogenic pesticide coincide with the maize culture. The nitrates are well associated with spinal chord defects and the estrogenic materials with increases in reduction of male expression with males suffering from undescended testicles. The glysphosate herbicide now recognized as probable carcinogen and its use is well correlated with Parkinson disease epidemic, attention disorders in children and a range of digestive issues. The prevailing economic structure gives a false choice to use the chemical system or die of starvation. As we truly understand the vast issues related with chemical dependency of the world agricultural systems we will forced to make a prudent choice of going cold turkey. Luckily the Rodale Institute Farming System Trial has clearly demonstrated that biologically based soil first philosophy can be completely competitive with the chemical reliance and because improved soils both mitigate the effects of drought and counteract greenhouse gases there really is no argument that accelerating the transition for chemical to biological agriculture is a need whose time has come. Interestingly small farmers in the tropics when they no longer can afford high input agriculture generally use paraquat herbicide to end their misery. The take home point is not only can we do much better but indeed the time has come that we must