Social Sciences, asked by hspavankumar061, 3 months ago

please answer this please i will mark as brainlist answer this. ​

Attachments:

Answers

Answered by rvss91024
1

Explanation:

1. since swapna had borrowed money from the local trader for her farm input needs she was forced to agree to the condition that she would sell the cotton produce to him. Hence she sold it to the local trader instead of the kurnool cotton market.

2. no, swapna did not get a fair price on the cotton. the local trader paid her low price.

3. the trader had lent swapna money at the beginning of the cropping season on a condition that she would sell all her cotton to him. Thus, swapna was in his grip. the trader took advantage of this situation and paid her a low price.

4. large farmers would sell their cotton in the Market. their situation is different from swapna. unlike swapna, they grew cotton on their own and therefore they are free to sell them anywhere they wish.

Similar questions