Question

please give my answer I will mark a brainliestand follow him also
pls gave only 6 points on this question​

Answer 1

Answer:

Unlike Mughals British didn't impose Jizya tax on Hindus. Economy – Mughals fared far better than British. British came to the richest country and made it one of the poorest when they left India. British looted Indian wealth and Indian money funded the great British Empire and their industrial revolution.

Answer 2

Definitely, Mughals would have made India better .

During Mughal period,

*Job opportunity was for all ( to work as a farmer , peasant , poet , army person , tailor , adviser , cook , jeweler ,etc )

* Many more startling building would be built .

* People paid tax . But the people’s need were met simultaneously.

* People had safety and security. And also could go meet the king or the ministers by themselves.

*Export and import were also flourishing. It would have gained more fame .

* It was a monarchy rule . So the king can decide for himself and make good decisions with the help of the ministers .

* India would have retained its precious wealth of gold , silver , kohinoor diamond and many more .

So personally I think Mughal kingdom would have been good .

Hope this answer helps you.
Mark me as the Brainliest if I am worth it .