Question

pls, help a fellow armii!!

In 2003, Georgia lawmakers prompted a discussion about changing the state flag.

HB 380 as amended went to the house floor on April 8. After more than six hours of impassioned debate, the house passed the bill by a vote of 111–67. All 39 black Democrats voted against the bill because of the second referendum provision, which could allow the return to the 1956 flag. Most white Democrats from rural areas had voted for the bill. It appeared that a potentially damaging split had developed within the Democratic Party, with blacks and urban whites pitted against rural whites.

–“Yet Another New Flag,”
Edwin Jackson

Which evidence from the text supports the idea that politicians were divided over a new flag? Check all that apply.

There were six hours of debate.
The bill was sent to the house floor.
The bill was passed by the house.
All black Democrats voted against the bill.
All rural white Democrats voted for the bill.
A bill had been written to call for a new flag.

pls no spam

Answer 1

s there are six hours of debate

Answer 2

Answer:

A bill had been written to call for a new flag.

Explanation:

hope it helps pls pls follow&mark brainliest ^_^