History, asked by lianaAye, 7 months ago

pls someone help me with this pls pls

Attachments:

Answers

Answered by prastutibarman9
2

Answer:

“Though I had spoken well enough for my side to win the debate by a two-thirds majority, I knew I had made better speeches that had not acquired a tenth of the fan following,” Tharoor recalls in his latest book Inglorious Empire: What the British Did to India published in India in late 2016 and the rest of the world in early 2017. “I honestly did not think I had said anything terribly new.”

What he may not have realised then is that he had managed to provide not just very succinct and persuasive arguments against the empire but also quantify the scale of its ills. Following which, in a world where nearly two-thirds of Britons believe that the empire was “something to be proud of” and where many Indians seem to think that its overall effect on their country may have been positive, Tharoor felt he could not turn down the “moral urgency of explaining why colonialism was the horror it turned out to be.”

Answered by prahaladsai
0

Answer:no

Explanation:

i mean it would have been better in terms of week u know economic growth

but indians would have been supperessed it would be a aussie or american situation

Similar questions