PLZ HELP!!!!!!!!!! I am on a test. Will give 50 points and mark as brainliest.
Imagine your local city council is considering a city-wide curfew in response to a recent increase in crimes committed by teens. The proposed curfew would prohibit unsupervised children under 17 from being out after 9:00 p.m. on weekdays, and after 10:00 p.m. on weekends. Some believe the curfews is a good prevention tool, keeping at-risk kids from becoming victims or criminals. Opponents argue confining innocent youth to their homes does not make young people more responsible. In a well-written paragraph, analyze whether the benefits of creating this curfew are worth the costs. Use examples from personal experience or the module to support your answer.
Answers
curfew is also a good way but it even gives lots of problems such as
cannot get out of the house
could not be able bring some stationary items
.............
and it will be problem or a great difficulty to do their work.
The notion that curfew would prevent teens from getting into crimes is somewhat outdated. The psyche of teens is often associated with that of rebellious behaviour and restricting their movement would only cause more infringements of the law. The nefarious activities are not time-sensitive rather more of a social construct or, better known as, peer pressure. The ideal way to counter the rise in crime among teens is to provide for guidance or counselling to make them capable individuals of deciding what constitutes right and wrong.
An example would be the prevalence of teen pregnancies, and how many countries have initiated free medical check-ups for teens to ensure widespread disbursement of information relating to sexual health.