Q 1. Is it important to make women aware of there reproductive health in rural India. Give three reason to justify your opinion.
Q2. How important is it to maintain reproductive health in a developing country like India.
Q3. How the awareness of reproductive health influence on the population growth , social and economic growth in India.
Q4. “Present youth is future India ”. How can you relate this statement with the spread of awareness of regarding SRH among people of rural India.
Answer all questions properly to be the brainliest. Else will report your answer and account.
Answers
Answer:
1)Sexual and reproductive health care includes preventing and treating sexually transmitted infections, including HIV/AIDS. In addition, reproductive health care can bring patients into the health care system, encouraging diagnosis and treatment of other diseases and conditions.
2)Reproductive health and preconception care are intrinsically linked. Practicing safe sex – preventing STIs and unwanted pregnancy – when we're younger, is important for both our health and our fertility. It means, when the time comes to start a family, our reproductive system will be in much healthier shape.
3)Reproductive health education, including messages to encourage abstinence and promote the use of condoms and contraceptives by those who are sexually active, is the front line of efforts to prevent pregnancy, AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) among America's adolescents
4)Background: Although India’s health policy is directed toward improving adolescent reproductive health, adolescent-friendly health services are scarce. The intervention for “integrating adolescent-friendly health services into the public health system” is an effort to improve the health status of adolescents in rural areas of the Varanasi (Arajiline) and Bangalore (Hosakote) districts in India. The purpose of this article is to describe the features of the intervention and investigate the impact on improving awareness and utilization of services by adolescent as well as quality of ARSH services in the intervention districts.
Methods: Data from project monitoring, community survey (737 adolescents), exit interviews (120 adolescents), assessment of adolescent sexual and reproductive health clinics (n = 4), and health service statistics were used. Descriptive analyses and paired t-tests were used to compare the two intervention districts.
Results: Overall, the percentage of adolescents who were aware of the services being offered at a health-care facility was higher in Hosakote (range: 56.2% to 74.7%) as compared to Arajiline (range: 67.3% to 96.9); 23.3% and 42.6% of adolescents in Arajiline and Hosakote typically sought multiple services at any one visit. A large percentage of clients (Arajiline: 81.7%; Hosakote: 95.0%) were satisfied with the services they received from the facility. The relative change in uptake of services from the first quarter (January to March 2009) to the last quarter (October to December 2010) was significantly higher in Arajiline (7.93, P = 0.020) than in Hosakote (0.78, P = 0.007).
Conclusion: The intervention had positive results for the public health system and the services are being scaled up to different blocks of the districts, under a public-private partnership.
Explanation:
this is just to ask that in which school are you cause I got the same question as my multiple assessment :)