Question

Q.4. Had you been in place of the Squirrel what other arguments you would have put forth to prove your point?

​

Answer 1

$\small\mathbf\red{{Answer\:❤}}$

Explanation:

The squirrel defends itself against the big mountain by saying that although it is small, it is more lively and energetic. If it cannot carry forests on its back, neither the mountain can crack a nut. They both have different talents.

Q.4. Had you been in place of the Squirrel what other arguments you would have put forth to prove your point?

Answer 2

Answer:

• The squirrel argues that although being little, it is more alive and vigorous than the large mountain. The mountain cannot open a nut if it cannot bear forests on its back. Both of them have unique abilities.
• Although he is too little, the squirrel claimed that he is more animated and energetic. If he is unable to carry woods on his back, the mountain will also be unable to open a nut. Both of them have unique abilities.
• Both significant things and little things are important in the world. A mountain cannot open a nut if a squirrel cannot carry a forest on its back.

#SPJ6