Question

Que. 13 :
To whom is the ultimate sovereignty
assigned?​

Answer 1

Answer:

don't know.........

plz follow me and add brainlist plzzzz

Answer 2

Answer:

Explanation:

The constitution of India announced the ultimate sovereign to the Indian People. Indian Constitution gives the liberty to its residents to choose their representatives by the method of polling in every Five years.

more about sovereignty

Sovereignty is the full right and power of a governing body over itself, without any interference from outside sources or bodies. In political theory, sovereignty is a substantive term designating supreme legitimate authority over some polity.[1] In international law, sovereignty is the exercise of power by a state. De jure sovereignty refers to the legal right to do so; de facto sovereignty refers to the factual ability to doing so. This can become an issue of special concern upon the failure of the usual expectation that de jure and de facto sovereignty exist at the place and time of concern, and reside within the same organization.

Contents

Etymology

The term arises from the unattested Vulgar Latin's *superanus, (itself derived form of Latin super - "over") meaning "chief", "ruler".[2] Its spelling, which varied from the word's first appearance in English in the fourteenth century, was influenced by the English reign.[3][4]

Concepts

The concepts of sovereignty have been discussed throughout history, and are still actively debated.[5][6] Its definition, concept, and application has changed throughout, especially during the Age of Enlightenment. The current notion of state sovereignty contains four aspects consisting of territory, population, authority and recognition.[7] According to Stephen D. Krasner, the term could also be understood in four different ways:

Domestic sovereignty – actual control over a state exercised by an authority organized within this state,[8]

Interdependence sovereignty – actual control of movement across state's borders, assuming the borders exist,[8]

International legal sovereignty – formal recognition by other sovereign states,[8]

Westphalian sovereignty – lack of other authority over state other than the domestic authority (examples of such other authorities could be a non-domestic church, a non-domestic political organization, or any other external agent).[8]

Often, these four aspects all appear together, but this is not necessarily the case – they are not affected by one another, and there are historical examples of states that were non-sovereign in one aspect while at the same time being sovereign in another of these aspects.[8] According to Immanuel Wallerstein, another fundamental feature of sovereignty is that it is a claim that must be recognised by others if it is to have any meaning:

Sovereignty is more than anything else a matter of legitimacy [...that] requires reciprocal recognition. Sovereignty is a hypothetical trade, in which two potentially conflicting sides, respecting de facto realities of power, exchange such recognitions as their least costly strategy.[9]