Political Science, asked by BrainlyHelper, 1 year ago

Question 4:
Read the news report below and identify the following aspects:
(a) What is the case about?
(b)Who has been the beneficiary in the case?
(c)Who is the petitioner in the case?
(d)Visualise what would have been the different arguments put forward by the company.
(e)What arguments would the farmers have put forward?
Supreme Court orders REL to pay Rs 300 crore to Dahanu farmers
Our Corporate Bureau 24 March 2005
Mumbai: The Supreme Court has ordered Reliance Energy to pay Rs. 300 crore to farmers who grow the chikoo fruit in the Dahanu area outside Mumbai. The order comes after the chikoo growers petitioned the court against the pollution caused by Reliance’s thermal power plant.
Dahanu, which is 150 km from Mumbai, was a self-sustaining agricultural and horticultural economy known for its fisheries and forests just over a decade ago, but was devastated in 1989 when a thermal power plant came into operation in the region. The next year, this fertile belt saw its first crop failure. Now, 70 per cent of the crop of what was once the fruit bowl of Maharashtra is gone. The fisheries have shut and the forest cover has thinned. Farmers and environmentalists say that fly ash from the power plant entered ground water and polluted the entire eco-system. The Dahanu Taluka Environment Protection Authority ordered the thermal station to set up a pollution control unit to reduce sulphur emissions, and in spite of a Supreme Court order backing the order the pollution control plant was not set up even by 2002. In 2003, Reliance acquired the thermal station and re-submitted a schedule for installation process in 2004. As the pollution control plant is still not set up, the Dahanu Taluka Environmental Protection Authority asked Reliance for a bank guarantee of Rs. 300 crores.

Answers

Answered by nikitasingh79
14

ANSWER :  

(a)Forest and fisheries of the Dahanu area were destroyed in 1989 due to thermal power plant. The Dahanu Taluka environmental protection authority ordered the thermal station to set up pollution control unit but pollution control plan was not set up.

(b) In this case, beneficiary was farmers of Dahanu area. The supreme court order Reliance energy to pay ₹ 300 crore to farmers who grew chikoo fruit in the Dahanu area.

(c) In this case the petitioners were the chikoo growers of Dhanu area.

(d) (i) The company would have given the argument that the government should pay compensation to the farmers.

(ii) The people of Dhanu area got more employment opportunities with the establishment of thermal plant.

(iii) The company would Set up pollution control plant at the earliest.

(e) (i) Fertile land

(ii) The fisheries have shut down under forest cover has thinned.

(iii) The farmers would have demanded more compensation.

HOPE THIS ANSWER WILL HELP YOU…

Answered by swapanbsnl16
0

Answer:

Chiku" (and any subsequent words) was ignored because we limit queries to 32 words.

Similar questions