Question

Read excerpts from the judgment on the Olga Tellis vs Bombay
Municipal Corporation case. Now write in your own words what the
judges meant when they said that the Right to Livelihood was part of the
Right to Life.

Answer 1

Answer:

In Olga Tellis vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation case, the judges said that the Right to Livelihood was part of the Right to Life. They stated that life does not merely imply an animal existence; it cannot be lived without a means of living, that is, "the means of livelihood".

Answer 2

$\huge\bold\red{Answer:-}$

Bombay Municipal Corporation case, the judges said that the Right to Livelihood was part of the Right to Life. They stated that life does not merely imply an animal existence; it cannot be lived without a means of living, that is, "the means of livelihood".

$\bold\green{Thanks}$

• Hope it helps you
• Hope it helps youRegards, AKASHITEMHEAVEN