Question

Read this dialogue. Which argument do you agree with? Why? Amit: Looking at the constitutional provisions, it seems that the President is only a rubber stamp. Shama: The President appoints the Prime Minister. So, he must have the powers to remove the Prime Minister as well. Rajesh: We don’t need a President. After the election, the Parliament can meet and elect a leader to be the Prime Minister.

Answer 1

The explanation for the argument is...

Explanation:

• The argument given by Amit is more valid.
• It is that ''Looking at the constitutional provisions, it seems that the President is only a rubber stamp'' it is because in our country the president acts as a statute.  
• He just does what the other members of parliament ask him to do.  
• The Prime minister is more authorized than the president of our country.  

Learn more about it.  

(The function of the president)  

https://brainly.in/question/1245515.