science a warrior against superstitions Article
pls no spam
Answers
Over the past few decades, there has been an appreciable increase in efforts at science popularization by media persons, as well as professional scientists. This principally involves efforts in two directions: the first is to make scientific ideas accessible to a layperson, and the second is to develop a scientific attitude in her. I assume that the reader understands what I mean by scientific attitude, so I will not bother with defining it. In the first aim, I think that science popularization has been eminently successful. The plethora of books and articles in newspapers and magazines, and the unprecedented impact of television, has made it possible today for one to talk about the Pathfinder mission to Mars, or the cloning of sheep, in almost any company, without committing a faux pas. In the second aim, I feel there has been only a limited amount of success.This principally involves efforts in two directions: the first is to make scientific ideas accessible to a layperson, and the second is to develop a scientific attitude in her. I assume that the reader understands what I mean by scientific attitude, so I will not bother with defining it. In the first aim, I think that science popularization has been eminently successful. The plethora of books and articles in newspapers and magazines, and the unprecedented impact of television, has made it possible today for one to talk about the Pathfinder mission to Mars, or the cloning of sheep, in almost any company, without committing a faux pas. In the second aim, I feel there has been only a limited amount of success. This article tries to identify some of the failures of the science popularization megamachinery, in developing a scientific attitude among laypersons, and the reasons behind them.
One of the most important steps in the development of a scientific attitude is perceived by many, as a relentless fight against SUPERSTITIOUS BELIEFS . Superstitious beliefs are easy to define within the scientific framework. Any idea or theory that cannot be tested using the SCIENTIFIC METHOD, is superstition. Many rationalist organizations have put in great amounts of time and effort, to fight superstition. In their zealous pursuit, they have run into opposition from religious and other groups, that take offense to the rationalists incapability in distinguishing belief, from superstition. Is there really any difference between the two?
Hope it helped you
Please follow me
Please mark it's brain list answer
Answer:
ok
Explanation:
I will not do ok
by have a great day
