Sharing of powers makes a country more powerful and united.” Do you agree with this statement and why ? 3
Explain with example the role of political leaders to determine the outcome of politics of social divisions. 3
”The Government of India gives holidays for the festivals of most of the religions. Why is it so Give your view point.
CBSE Class X Social Science SA ( 3 marks)
Answers
Answered by
502
Power sharing keeps up with the 'Spirit' of Democracy as :
(a) Power sharing ensures that all people have stake in government.
(b) Power sharing ensures maximum participation. It upholds the concept of people's rule. It always brings better outcomes in democracy. It ensures the political stability in democracy.
(c) Power sharing accommodates diverse groups. It helps to reduce the possibility of conflict between social groups.
(i) India is a secular state, there is no official religion in our country.
(ii) The Constitution provides freedom to all to profess, practice and propagate any religion or not to follow any.
(iii)The Constitution prohibits discrimination on the ground of religion.
Answered by
47
Answer:
yes I am agree with the statement power sharing makes a country more United possibility and conflict in social group it is a good way to ensure the stability order as social conflict of leads to where is right of democracy the concept of democracy is a system of government of the people by the people and for the people enzymes on distribution of power wallpaper it involves sharing powers with those affected by its exercise
Similar questions
Computer Science,
8 months ago
History,
8 months ago
Social Sciences,
8 months ago
Social Sciences,
1 year ago
Social Sciences,
1 year ago
Biology,
1 year ago
Hindi,
1 year ago
(i) It is easier to accommodate demands that are within the Constitutional framework and are not
at the cost of another community.
(ii) The demand for ’only Sinhala’ was at the cost of the interest and identity of the Tamil community
in Sri Lanka.
(iii) In Yugoslavia, the leaders of different ethnic communities presented their demands in such a
way that these could not be accommodated within a single country.