Short speech on good deeds never die
Answers
Answered by
1
Karma means Deeds.
Karma is used in a special meaning in philosophy. Whatever he does him no fruit is produced. This fruit good, bad, or both is different. This form of the fruit is stable by the action. Dan is auspicious violence is bad karma. Here the word karma is used for both action and fruit. It is based on the feeling that action is always attached to the fruit. The fruit must act occurs. Here it must be noted that inclusion is not the body's natural functions. The rise of the eye lids, fall is also action, but it generated no fruit. In the range of vision of this type of action has no importance so that the action of mind is not inspired. The general rule in mind: to inspire actions applies. Deliberately to kill anyone or any donation is very meaningful. But inadvertently give someone a favor or to harm anyone Uktpridi of what does not work? It is said that ignorance of law rules can not save man from the fruits of action. Gita also says that the good and evil deeds, the fruit must suffer, do not get rid of him. Any actions taken in this case, knowingly or unknowingly have had good and bad fruit. Actions taken inadvertently said ignorance about the only fault of the subject and the subject is responsible for the defect. Subject to the action of the force must first detect all things related to action. Irresistibly eye lashes fall, but did not want to be no action in ignorance. The purpose of the action is different from the result of the action, but that action is not necessary. Therefore, in the periphery of the actions and deeds are the fruits which are different from natural actions.
With regard to the fruit of action and expression of cause is based on the unbreakable rule. Must be the reason why the job exists. This is also true in the field of natural law practice. Therefore, it is said that the fruit must be the subject of the verb is the experience. Buddhists believed to be transient, but the doers to be adhering to the rules of uniformity in Kshnsntan Assuming they say that a person is different from the children of the children of the other person. There is also the difference in personality ; So is the person indulges in Purwnish pandit-life action. If we do not assume that someone else will have to say no one reaps the fruit of the action taken by the argument against. If this rule is if the full faith argument for us to accept another conclusion forces. If all actions have to reap what those actions are already subject to usufruct dies? Or so we will have to leave the principle of karma or, to be recognized that the subject does not die, it only alters the body. Indian thinkers have unanimously accepted the other side. They die, the body naturally work, but for the enjoyment it is not necessary that the same body death the action is. Experience is different and enjoyment of the fruits to the second body holds. Incidental death of the body is natural, has no effect on the action. Therefore, the theory of karma and rebirth can not be separated.
The doctrine of karma associated with the thoughts of heaven and hell. Gross result of merits to heaven is full of pleasures. In contrast leads to hell. Heaven in Hell according to the amount of good and evil deeds are known to be many levels, many levels, such as on Earth. To accept the theory of karma imagine hell to be necessary, which we believe is auspicious date Absurd virtuous deeds they are called sins. Virtue and sin mainly provide realization of the fruits of action. These three types of action have frontage. Routines that they do not generate the sin, but not to produce anything. Casual and not by virtue of a deed is sin. Kamy deeds are wished therefore they are the fruits of accomplishment. Not to do anything happens. Since the merit of the three works, it is intended to be hidden, to be away from sin, so all these things in mind: inspiration. To get rid of the continual rise, casual and Kamy abandon deeds is considered essential. So, good deeds never Die.
Karma is used in a special meaning in philosophy. Whatever he does him no fruit is produced. This fruit good, bad, or both is different. This form of the fruit is stable by the action. Dan is auspicious violence is bad karma. Here the word karma is used for both action and fruit. It is based on the feeling that action is always attached to the fruit. The fruit must act occurs. Here it must be noted that inclusion is not the body's natural functions. The rise of the eye lids, fall is also action, but it generated no fruit. In the range of vision of this type of action has no importance so that the action of mind is not inspired. The general rule in mind: to inspire actions applies. Deliberately to kill anyone or any donation is very meaningful. But inadvertently give someone a favor or to harm anyone Uktpridi of what does not work? It is said that ignorance of law rules can not save man from the fruits of action. Gita also says that the good and evil deeds, the fruit must suffer, do not get rid of him. Any actions taken in this case, knowingly or unknowingly have had good and bad fruit. Actions taken inadvertently said ignorance about the only fault of the subject and the subject is responsible for the defect. Subject to the action of the force must first detect all things related to action. Irresistibly eye lashes fall, but did not want to be no action in ignorance. The purpose of the action is different from the result of the action, but that action is not necessary. Therefore, in the periphery of the actions and deeds are the fruits which are different from natural actions.
With regard to the fruit of action and expression of cause is based on the unbreakable rule. Must be the reason why the job exists. This is also true in the field of natural law practice. Therefore, it is said that the fruit must be the subject of the verb is the experience. Buddhists believed to be transient, but the doers to be adhering to the rules of uniformity in Kshnsntan Assuming they say that a person is different from the children of the children of the other person. There is also the difference in personality ; So is the person indulges in Purwnish pandit-life action. If we do not assume that someone else will have to say no one reaps the fruit of the action taken by the argument against. If this rule is if the full faith argument for us to accept another conclusion forces. If all actions have to reap what those actions are already subject to usufruct dies? Or so we will have to leave the principle of karma or, to be recognized that the subject does not die, it only alters the body. Indian thinkers have unanimously accepted the other side. They die, the body naturally work, but for the enjoyment it is not necessary that the same body death the action is. Experience is different and enjoyment of the fruits to the second body holds. Incidental death of the body is natural, has no effect on the action. Therefore, the theory of karma and rebirth can not be separated.
The doctrine of karma associated with the thoughts of heaven and hell. Gross result of merits to heaven is full of pleasures. In contrast leads to hell. Heaven in Hell according to the amount of good and evil deeds are known to be many levels, many levels, such as on Earth. To accept the theory of karma imagine hell to be necessary, which we believe is auspicious date Absurd virtuous deeds they are called sins. Virtue and sin mainly provide realization of the fruits of action. These three types of action have frontage. Routines that they do not generate the sin, but not to produce anything. Casual and not by virtue of a deed is sin. Kamy deeds are wished therefore they are the fruits of accomplishment. Not to do anything happens. Since the merit of the three works, it is intended to be hidden, to be away from sin, so all these things in mind: inspiration. To get rid of the continual rise, casual and Kamy abandon deeds is considered essential. So, good deeds never Die.
Similar questions