Question

should more be done to give the homeless the right to vote? please give both sides of the argument

Answer 1

Answer:

1. A person owing loyalty to and entitled by birth or naturalization to the protection of a state or nation.

2. A resident of a city or town, especially one entitled to vote and enjoy other privileges there.

3.A civilian

4.A native, inhabitant, or denizen of a particular place

As we can see, all of the above descriptions describe a homeless person. He is entitled to protection of the state, he is a civilian, and he inhabitants an area. We can clearly see that if a homeless man fits the description of a civilian, and a civilian is entitled the right to vote, then clearly, it is discriminatory to the homeless person. It is on par with supressing the rights of other minorities, and, should be treated a so.

Like all people, the homeless have an opinion, and in government, want their interests to be represented, like any other citizen. If someone agrees with the Republican party, they vote for them. If someone agrees with the Democratic party they vote for them. The homeless would obviously want someone to address the issue of homelessness. Not having their voice heard means they may never get out of poverty and find a home.

Answer 2

Question Given :

• => should more be done to give the homeless the right to vote? please give both sides of the argument

Required Solution :

My View on this :

• => Individuals can influence governmental decision-making is through voting.

• => Voting is a formal expression of preference for a candidate for office or for a proposed resolution of an issue.

• => Voting generally takes place in the context of a large-scale national or regional election, however, local and small-scale community elections can be just as critical to individual participation in government.

_______________________