Social Sciences, asked by prajnishkumar96, 11 months ago

some information about lord Dalhousie​

Answers

Answered by HERO420
1

Explanation:

heyy buddy ☺️☺️

here are some information About it

James Andrew Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie KT PC, also known as Lord Dalhousie, styled Lord Ramsay until 1838 and known as The Earl of Dalhousie between 1838 and 1849, was a Scottish statesman and colonial administrator in British India. He served as Governor-General of India from 1848 to 1856. Wikipedia

James Andrew Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie KT PC, also known as Lord Dalhousie, styled Lord Ramsay until 1838 and known as The Earl of Dalhousie between 1838 and 1849, was a Scottish statesman and colonial administrator in British India. He served as Governor-General of India from 1848 to 1856. WikipediaBorn: 22 April 1812, Dalhousie Castle Hotel, United Kingdom

James Andrew Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie KT PC, also known as Lord Dalhousie, styled Lord Ramsay until 1838 and known as The Earl of Dalhousie between 1838 and 1849, was a Scottish statesman and colonial administrator in British India. He served as Governor-General of India from 1848 to 1856. WikipediaBorn: 22 April 1812, Dalhousie Castle Hotel, United KingdomDied: 19 December 1860, Dalhousie Castle Hotel, United Kingdom

James Andrew Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie KT PC, also known as Lord Dalhousie, styled Lord Ramsay until 1838 and known as The Earl of Dalhousie between 1838 and 1849, was a Scottish statesman and colonial administrator in British India. He served as Governor-General of India from 1848 to 1856. WikipediaBorn: 22 April 1812, Dalhousie Castle Hotel, United KingdomDied: 19 December 1860, Dalhousie Castle Hotel, United KingdomFull name: James Andrew Broun-Ramsay

James Andrew Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie KT PC, also known as Lord Dalhousie, styled Lord Ramsay until 1838 and known as The Earl of Dalhousie between 1838 and 1849, was a Scottish statesman and colonial administrator in British India. He served as Governor-General of India from 1848 to 1856. WikipediaBorn: 22 April 1812, Dalhousie Castle Hotel, United KingdomDied: 19 December 1860, Dalhousie Castle Hotel, United KingdomFull name: James Andrew Broun-RamsaySpouse: Susan Broun-Ramsay, Marchioness of Dalhousie (m. 1836–1853)

James Andrew Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie KT PC, also known as Lord Dalhousie, styled Lord Ramsay until 1838 and known as The Earl of Dalhousie between 1838 and 1849, was a Scottish statesman and colonial administrator in British India. He served as Governor-General of India from 1848 to 1856. WikipediaBorn: 22 April 1812, Dalhousie Castle Hotel, United KingdomDied: 19 December 1860, Dalhousie Castle Hotel, United KingdomFull name: James Andrew Broun-RamsaySpouse: Susan Broun-Ramsay, Marchioness of Dalhousie (m. 1836–1853)Children: Lady Susan Georgiana Ramsay, Susan Ramsay, Lady Edith Christian Ramsay, more

James Andrew Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie KT PC, also known as Lord Dalhousie, styled Lord Ramsay until 1838 and known as The Earl of Dalhousie between 1838 and 1849, was a Scottish statesman and colonial administrator in British India. He served as Governor-General of India from 1848 to 1856. WikipediaBorn: 22 April 1812, Dalhousie Castle Hotel, United KingdomDied: 19 December 1860, Dalhousie Castle Hotel, United KingdomFull name: James Andrew Broun-RamsaySpouse: Susan Broun-Ramsay, Marchioness of Dalhousie (m. 1836–1853)Children: Lady Susan Georgiana Ramsay, Susan Ramsay, Lady Edith Christian Ramsay, moreEducation: Christ Church, Harrow School

hope it's helpful to you ☺️☺️

mark as brainlist plzzzzzz if you like it

Answered by shawnsquires23
1

Answer: pleas give me brainleast

Explanation:

Lord Dalhousie came to India as the Governor-General in 1848. He was from the beginning determined to extend direct British rule over as large area as possible.

Lord Dalhousie

Dalhousie had declared that "the extinction of all native states of India is just a question of time". The ostensible reason for this policy was his belief that British administration was far superior to the corrupt and oppressive administration of the native rulers.

The underlying motive of Dalhousie’s policy was the expansion of British exports to India.

Dalhousie, in common with other aggressive imperialists, believed that British exports to the native states of India were suffering because of the maladministration of these states by their Indian rulers.

Doctrine of Lapse

The chief instrument through which Lord Dalhousie implemented his policy of annexation was the ‘Doctrine of Lapse.’

Under the Doctrine of Lapse, when the ruler of a protected state died without a natural heir, his/her state was not to pass to an adopted heir as sanctioned by the age-old tradition of the country. Instead, it was to be annexed to the British dominions unless the adoption had been clearly approved earlier by the British authorities.

Many states, including Satara in 1848 and Nagpur and Jhansi in 1854, were annexed by applying this doctrine.

Dalhousie also refused to recognize the titles of many ex-rulers or to pay their pensions. Thus, the titles of the Nawabs of Carnatic and of Surat and the Raja of Tanjore were extinguished.

After the death of the ex-Peshwa Baji Rao II, who had been made the Raja of Bithur, Dalhousie refused to extend his pay or pension to his adopted son, Nana Saheb.

Lord Dalhousie was keen on annexing the kingdom of Avadh. But the task presented certain difficulties. For one, the Nawabs of Avadh had been British allies since the Battle of Buxer. Moreover, they had been most obedient to the British over the years.

The Nawab of Avadh had many heirs and could not therefore be covered by the Doctrine of Lapse. Some other pretext had to be found for depriving him of his dominions.

Lord Dalhousie hit upon the idea of alleviating the plight of the people of Avadh. Nawab Wajid Ali Shah was accused of having misgoverned his state and of refusing to introduce reforms. His state was therefore annexed in 1856.

Undoubtedly, the degeneration of the administration of Avadh was a painful reality for its people.

The Nawabs of Avadh, like other princes of the day, were selfish rulers absorbed in self-indulgence who cared little for good administration for the welfare of the people. However, the responsibility for this state of affairs was in part that of the British who had at least since, 1801 controlled and indirectly governed Avadh.

Similar questions