state converse of thasle theorem
Answers
First, let the line d intersect the sides AB and AC of △ABC at distinct points E and G, respectively, such that AEEB=AGGC. We now need to prove that EG∥BC.
Assume EG∦BC. Then there must be another line intersecting point E of side AB as well as some point, say F, of side AC that is parallel to BC. So, let EF∥BC.
By Thales Theorem, since EF∥BC, it follows that:
AEEB=AFFC(1)
But we are given
AEEB=AGGC(2)
Hence, from (1) and (2), it must follow that
AFFC=AGGC(3)
Adding "1" to both sides of equation (3) gives us:
AFFC+FCFC=AGGC+GCGC
which simplifies to AF+FCFC=AG+GCGC⟹ACFC=ACGC⟹FC=GC
But FC=GC is only possible when points F and G coincide with one another, i.e. if EF is the line d=EG itself.
But EF∥BC, and hence it cannot be the case that EG=EF∦BC.
Therefore, if a line divides any two sides of a triangle in the same ratio, then the line is parallel to the third side: i.e. the converse of Thales Theorem has been established.
Converse of "Thales Theorem":
First, let the line intersect the sides and of at distinct points E and G, respectively, such that We now need to prove that .
Assume . Then there must be another line intersecting point of side as well as some point, say , of side that is parallel to . So, let .
By Thales Theorem, since , it follows that:
But we are given
Hence, from (1) and (2), it must follow that
Adding "1" to both sides of equation (3) gives us:
which simplifies to
But is only possible when points and coincide with one another, i.e. if is the line itself.
But , and hence it cannot be the case that .
Therefore, if a line divides any two sides of a triangle in the same ratio, then the line is parallel to the third side: i.e. the converse of Thales Theorem has been established