Question

Students Life150Word

Answer 1

Is it possible to work 70 hours a week? Yes! Some students do! Sometimes, it is very hard for students to deal with part-time job, school, long-term works, friends and family obligations. It is not always feasible to work all night on an essay that you hadn't the time to work on. Unfortunately, some students take the easy way to settle the problem... they copy someone's work and make it as their own. This is why I am asking this question:"What do you think the punishment should be if a student is caught plagiarizing?" Repression is not the right way to settle the problem of plagiarism. Of course, I am not in favor of plagiarism. But before punishing students, I think we should look at the origin of the problem. Why students are cheating? This is what I will explore in this text. 
             First of all, when you study at college or university, you need a lot of money. School fees and books are very costly and if you need an apartment, it is even more expensive. For example, according to the MEQ, it costs about 1668$ just to have the right to study in a university. Again from MEQ, for 2 years of Cégep and 3 years of university, students are in debt for an average of 21500$. So, unless you have rich parents, loans and bursaries from government are often insufficient to live. Consequently, students really need a part-time job. They simply don't have the choice. Working 15 to 20 hours a week means that students have less time to dedicate to their school work... then they copy. To me, government should reduce school fees. It would reduce cheating. 
             Also, students do not always have the time to do their assignments. Sometimes, it is like that tutors co-ordinate assignments so that the due date is the same day. Even the most organized student can find himself sitting at the computer at 4am. Are these assignments really necessary? And it is worse when you have a job. Data from stat
             ...

Answer 2

Student Life is the independent student-run newspaper of Washington University in St. Louis. It was founded in 1878 and incorporated in 1999. It is published by the Washington University Student Media, Inc. and is not subject to the approval of the University administration, thus making it the independent student voice.

Everyday life, daily life or routine life comprises the ways in which people typically act, think, and feel on a daily basis. Everyday life may be described as mundane, routine, natural, habitual, or normal.  

Human diurnality means most people sleep at least part of the night and are active in daytime. Most eat two or three meals in a day. Working time (apart from shift work) mostly involves a daily schedule, beginning in the morning. This produces the daily rush hours experienced by many millions, and the drive time focused on by radio broadcasters. Evening is often leisure time. Bathing every day is a custom for many.  

Beyond these broad similarities, lifestyles vary and different people spend their days differently. Nomadic life differs from sedentism, and among the sedentary, urban people live differently from rural folk. Differences in the lives of the rich and the poor, or between factory workers and intellectuals, may go beyond their working hours. Many women spend their day in activities greatly different from those of men, and everywhere children do different things than adults.  

Everyday life is a key concept in cultural studies and is a specialized subject in the field of sociology. Some argue that, motivated by capitalism and industrialism's degrading effects on human existence and perception, writers and artists of the 19th century turned more towards self-reflection and the portrayal of everyday life represented in their writings and art to a noticeably greater degree than in past works, for example Renaissance literature's interest in hagiography and politics.[1] Other theorists dispute this argument based on a long history of writings about daily life which can be seen in works from Ancient Greece, medieval Christianity and the Age of Enlightenment.[2][3]  

In the study of everyday life gender has been an important factor in its conceptions. Some theorists regard women as the quintessential representatives and victims of everyday life.[2]  

The connotation of everyday life is often negative and is distinctively separated from exceptional moments by its lack of distinction and differentiation, ultimately defined as the essential, taken-for-granted continuum of mundane activity that outlines forays into more esoteric experiences. It is the non-negotiable reality that exists amongst all social groupings without discrimination and is an unavoidable basis for which all human endeavor exists.[1]  

Much of everyday life is automatic in that it is driven by current environmental features as mediated by automatic cognitive processing of those features, and without any mediation by conscious choice, according to social psychologist John A. Bargh.[4] Daily life is also studied by sociologists to investigate how it is organised and given meaning. A sociological journal called the Journal of Mundane Behavior, published 2000 - 2004, studied these everyday actions.