Social Sciences, asked by anishpraharsha9871, 1 year ago

Summary of the man in black by goldsmith

Answers

Answered by alinakincsem
31
Thank you for getting in touch with us for the answer of your query. In the essay, "man in black", Oliver Goldsmith displays the different examples. The author talks about a man who is regretful of his charitable actions. The man is a philanthropist and he is ashamed about it. The author gives different examples of how he is the only man I ever knew who seemed ashamed of his natural generosity. The man cannot show his generous behavior without feeling ashamed about it. He wants others to see him as a man who is careless about others. He is man in black, because he does not show his generosity. He does not want anyone to notice him for this.
Answered by zainabg2905
19

In this essay, the author talks of a man who is remorseful of his charitable actions. The man is an obvious philanthropist, but he is ashamed of it. Goldmith lays out the ways, and gives examples,

of how “he is the only man I ever knew who seemed ashamed of his natural benevolence.”

First Paragraph:

The man is a charitable man. He cares about others, gives to others, and shares with others, but he pretends to not care about the well-being of others. He is “ashamed of his natural benevolence.” While he pretends to have a disliking for mankind, he’s not very good at pretending to be. The author reveals that his poker face is not up to par. “… While his looks were softened into pity, I have heard him use the language of the most unbounded ill-nature.”

Second Paragraph :

The “Man in Black” is so concerned with the place of the poor, that he complains to the author of how ignorant the countrymen, or wealthy, are to the state of living of the poorer people. He says that the poor only want a few things – food, housing, clothes, and warmth but cannot obtain those things due to the negligence of the fortunate.

Third Paragraph:

The man in black gives a beggar a piece of silver, but when doing so, he appeared “ashamed” to present his weakness to the author; the man has too much pride to show his soft spot for the less fortunate.

Fourth paragraph:

When a man with a wooden leg passed the author and the man in black, the author ignored him. The man in black showed much attention to him, but instead of giving him alms, he called him out to be a poser of the needy. But once hearing the sailor’s story of fighting in defense of the country while others “did nothing at home”, the man gave alms to him.

Fifth paragraph:

The man in black and the author ran into a woman who was an obvious example of helpless, but he had no money to give her. He became shameful, as it was presented in his face, but once he found a “shilling’s worth of matches”, and placed it in her hands, he was pleased with himself seeing the smile in the woman’s face. This anonymous man, the Man In Black, is a man of benevolence, and is bluntly shameful of it. There is no understanding of why.

The man is one who cannot exhibit generous behavior without being ashamed of it. He wants the world to see him as a man who does not care too much about the well-being of others; much less, the unfortunate. He is the “Man In Black”, because he hides his benevolence. He does not want to be noticed for it. He is, the Man in Black.

Similar questions