Write the differences between Parliamentary and presidential systems.
Disclaimer - No irrelevant answers.
Answers
Answered by
3
hii...
in parliamentary form- president has no real powers. powers are vested in the prime minister.... whereas in presidential the president is having all the powers...
_______
hope this helps !
in parliamentary form- president has no real powers. powers are vested in the prime minister.... whereas in presidential the president is having all the powers...
_______
hope this helps !
Answered by
4
Howdy!!
your answer is -
PARLIAMENTARY => the head of state in a parliament (generally Prime Minister) is elected by the legislature.
PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM ==> a President is elected by the voters.
In the Presidential System, it is more difficult to enact legislation, especially in the event that the President has different beliefs than the legislative body. The President only responds to the people, the legislative branch can't really do anything to threaten the President. As a result, he can make it more difficult for the legislative body to do anything.
In the Parliamentary system, if the Parliament doesn't like the Prime Minister, they can cast a vote of no confidence and replace him. This tends to make the executive leader subservient to the Parliament.
Bottom line is, if you believe that government should have more checks and balances, then a Presidential system will give you that. If you believe that it should have the power to enact laws quickly, then you should go for a Parliamentary system.
hope it help you
your answer is -
PARLIAMENTARY => the head of state in a parliament (generally Prime Minister) is elected by the legislature.
PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM ==> a President is elected by the voters.
In the Presidential System, it is more difficult to enact legislation, especially in the event that the President has different beliefs than the legislative body. The President only responds to the people, the legislative branch can't really do anything to threaten the President. As a result, he can make it more difficult for the legislative body to do anything.
In the Parliamentary system, if the Parliament doesn't like the Prime Minister, they can cast a vote of no confidence and replace him. This tends to make the executive leader subservient to the Parliament.
Bottom line is, if you believe that government should have more checks and balances, then a Presidential system will give you that. If you believe that it should have the power to enact laws quickly, then you should go for a Parliamentary system.
hope it help you
Similar questions