Question

The Case For The Defence
Answer The Following Question :
1) Why was everyone certain about the identity of the murderer at the start of the trial?
2)How did the defense counsel trick the court at the end?

Answer 1

Answer:

Explanation:

Though the cause of death may not appear to be established by direct evidence, the medical testimony of experts and the circumstances of the case may be sufficient to infer that the death must be the result of the administration of poison. This is because the fact of death by poisoning is provable by circumstantial evidence at the trial of a person for murder by alleged poisoning, even though the autopsy and chemical analysis fail to disclose any poison.

S. K. Das claims and M. Hidayatullah, jr.: The evidence established that the appellant, who served as the deceased's medical advisor, purposefully set out to gain his patient's trust by first becoming her confidant, learning every detail of her affairs, and progressively taking over management of them. At the same time, he forged her signature on a dividend warrant, obtained an undated check from her, and planned to gain access to her property. M. Hidayatullah, jr.: The evidence established that the appellant, who served as the deceased's medical advisor, purposefully set out to gain his patient's trust by first becoming her confidant, learning every detail of her affairs, and progressively taking over management of them. At the same time, he forged her signature on a dividend warrant, obtained an undated check from her, and planned to gain access to her property.

See more:

https://brainly.in/question/25747039

#SPJ1